ACURA MDX . ORG
www.acuramdx.org ACURA MDX . ORG Archive > Off Topic > Other Automobiles
 
Coming Soon: Bentley super 4x4 SUV - Click HERE for Original Thread
Advertisement
msu79gt82
http://www.autocarmag.com/news_article.asp?na_id=214464

Thought about putting this thread in Comparisons :eek:

"Autocar has obtained tantalising details of a secret Bentley off-roader powered by a 450bhp 6.0-litre W12 engine that, if put into production, could radically alter the status quo at the upper end of the four-wheel-drive market. Codenamed BY616, the luxurious offering is among a number of proposals put forward by parent company Volkswagen in recent months as a means of further expanding the Bentley marque against a backdrop of surging sales, renewed brand awareness and an expanding customer base."
BWSmith201
Whoa...anybody wanna take one of THOSE offroad? :eek:

The paradigms, they are a shiftin'...
frostyra
quote:
Originally posted by BWSmith201
Whoa...anybody wanna take one of THOSE offroad?

How 'bout rock climbing?
anjan
How about the maintenance cost to keep it running :D It is a british car after all!
Advertisement
eurohazard
quote:
How about the maintenance cost to keep it running It is a british car after all!
That's true, almost.....seems to have lots of german influence....but still.

Also I never fully understood the "W" concept for the engines. (3 banks of cylinders running off of one common crankshaft, for those who don't know) I understand the need for "packaging efficiency", but the complexity and tooling costs have to outweigh the ease of packaging. I think a twin turbo V8 or a large displacement V12 would have been more cost effective and less headache-inducing to the owner.
anjan
quote:
Originally posted by eurohazard
That's true, almost.....seems to have lots of german influence....but still.

Also I never fully understood the "W" concept for the engines. (3 banks of cylinders running off of one common crankshaft, for those who don't know) I understand the need for "packaging efficiency", but the complexity and tooling costs have to outweigh the ease of packaging. I think a twin turbo V8 or a large displacement V12 would have been more cost effective and less headache-inducing to the owner.



Considering that the Germans have the least reliable cars now with VW at the bottom of the heap doesn't help :2:

The VW engineers love the W configuration and seem to apply it in everything from Passat to Bugatti and now possibly a Bentley. For the Bugatti I can understand the absolute necessity because its a W16 with 1001hp but in smaller its much more efficient and cost effective to have V8 or V12 like you said.
frostyra
Anyone know where there's a cross-section view of that "W" engine? I think I know about what it looks like, but a pic is worth a lot of words. Thanks.
eurohazard
I found a few, but they're not the best "cut aways".
Advertisement
eurohazard
2
anjan
Again this is not a true cross-section but this is the W16 from the Bugatti Veyron EB110

Powered by: Search Engine Indexer and vBulletin v2.2.9
Copyright © 2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited
Copyright 2000 Acuramdx.org. All Rights Reserved.