| 24Blacker11 |
Features of the 2005 RX330 not found on my 2001 MDX that I now can’t live without.
• Wood Steering Wheel
• Wood Shift Knob
• HID headlights with washers
• Steerable Headlight beams
• Dual Climate Controls (Driver/Pass)
• Dual Multi-temp Heated seats (Driver/Pass)
• Auto-on/Rain Sensing Wipers (Auto Speed Control)
• Auto-on Headlights
• Power Lift Gate (remote & driver switch)
• Rear Cargo Cover
• First Aid Kit
• Lighted Steering wheel Controls
• Lighted door handles and center console
• Telescoping Steering wheel
• 18” Wheels
• Body Side Molding
• Cargo Mat
• Rear Spoiler/Wind Deflector
• Second Row Seating Slide and Recline
• Second Row Center Storage Compartment
• Second Row Center Pass-thru
• One Touch Up/Down Power Windows
• One Touch Open/Close Power Moon Roof
• Driver Leg (under dash) airbag
Features the 2001 MDX has that the 2005 RX330 still doesn’t have:
• Rear Seat Climate Control
• 3rd Row Seating
• Rear Seat Power Outlet
• NAV system is not interactive while Driving (Must be stopped or in park)
• Tires – Not really good in snow (Michelin MXV vs. SUV tire)
• Passenger Side Mirror Auto-Tilt when Reverse
• No Satellite Radio Built-in (XM or Sirius)
• Storage Compartments for Driver/Pass sparse (really non-existent)
• Ipod Interface
Another concerns the use of RX330 as tow vehicle. I have a Honda Aquatrax (loaded weight with trailer ~1000lbs.) and the MDX tow was smooth as if there was nothing behind you. The RX330 get tossed around with every bump you go over when towing.
Finally the effective storage capacity for cargo is nearly non-existent in the RX330 compared to the MDX (even with 3rd seat in use!).
Mileage for the RX averages 19-21 with mixed driving which is the same as my MDX. (MDX was averaged over almost 110K and RX over 12K miles)
As far as price goes... I paid sticker for my '01 MDX Toruing/NAV when it came out in SEP 2000. The RX330 they discounted $6000 off list so it came in at just over $42K... almost the same price I paid for my MDX in 2000. The MDX provided me 110,000 miles of troublefree driving but the offer on the RX was a deal I couldn't refuse trading in my well used MDX for a new RX to fill the gap until the redesign and not have to sink any money into maintenance and repair items on the MDX (tires, brakes, 105K service etc...).
Biggest reason to buy the MDX is it's a drivers vehicle. The RX doesn't have the soul that the MDX has. There is no passion when driving the RX... just a way to get from point A to point B.
I can't wait until I get my new '07 MDX in the fall ! |
|
|
| Dog |
I don't get your decision. You could of had a 2005 MDX Touring (or even a 2006) for $6k less than you paid for your RX 330. And most of your "can't live without items" (first aid kit?!?) are either on the 2005 MDX or available as rather cheap add-ons. Whereas the advantages you state for the MDX - and they are significant ones - are simply not available on the RX.
Can you run through your logic again for getting an RX? |
|
|
| 24Blacker11 |
I’m sorry you missed the point of the post so please let me clarify for you…
Let me start by saying that there are probably not many people out there who are more passionate about Honda/Acura than I… just ask my dealer (First Acura) or Tim!
Yes Acura builds great vehicles … but so too does Lexus and their dealers are very willing to deal on price. Not to mention the way they “pamper you” throughout the sales and routine services visits. Acura could learn a little here about being a “luxury nameplate.”
Yes the MDX is a great SUV and I loved owning mine… but there are many others out there and it is tough to learn much from reading the literature and doing a small test drive. I bought my MDX when the RX300 was the “big seller” because Acura presented a better value over the Lexus, BWM and most others at the time.
Can you make an MDX “similar” to an RX by adding aftermarket parts (HIDs, First aid kit etc.) and Genuine Acura accessories YES… but when you cost compare the price of the “discounted” RX330 and the MDX plus all the extras required (over $2000+ installation) to bring to comparable equipment… the MDX doesn’t provide the same value to the consumer that Lexus does right now.
But in a year when we are looking for Acura to take it to the next level with the redesign of the MDX and we all wait in anticipation I thought people might be interested in a direct comparison from somebody who’s actually owned both vehicles and not just looked at the brochure or taken a “test drive”. I’ve looked at the complete list of ’07 accessories (Thanks Tim!) and I see that Acura again is looking like it wants the owners to “build the RX from parts” rather than providing these items standard as a true luxury brand should… and yes that includes a “First Aid Kit”… just compare to BMW, Lexus, and Mercedes… Acura step it up and gives us the value back!
Yes I could have gotten the ’05 or even ’06 MDX but other than some refinements it would have been basically the “same car” I had been driving for that previous 4 years 10 months… I don’t change my cars like some out there as I pay cash and drive them for 4-5 years. My wife and I have had at least 1 Acura in the garage since 1989 so brand loyalty is not the issue. When I looked at sinking extra money into the MDX I felt it was for a lost cause as the MDX remaining value was pretty low. I didn’t want to roll it over into “the same car” and Lexus was willing to deal.
Another interesting note is that my auto insurance when I traded the ’01 MDX for the ’05 RX330 actually went DOWN by over 20% for a brand new vehicle (almost $400). I live in MA which has regulated/standardized insurance pricing so this troubled me. Nearest I can say is that the insurance industry must perceive the RX as lower risk, safer, and cheaper to repair than the MDX… Acura needs to step up on this too.
I guess to summarize is Acura needs to open its eyes and get back to its roots of providing good value to customers and stop trying to rest on its laurels. |
|
|
| JL_SS |
quote:
Originally posted by 24Blacker11
I’m sorry you missed the point of the post so please let me clarify for you…
Let me start by saying that there are probably not many people out there who are more passionate about Honda/Acura than I… just ask my dealer (First Acura) or Tim!
Yes Acura builds great vehicles … but so too does Lexus and their dealers are very willing to deal on price. Not to mention the way they “pamper you” throughout the sales and routine services visits. Acura could learn a little here about being a “luxury nameplate.”
Yes the MDX is a great SUV and I loved owning mine… but there are many others out there and it is tough to learn much from reading the literature and doing a small test drive. I bought my MDX when the RX300 was the “big seller” because Acura presented a better value over the Lexus, BWM and most others at the time.
Can you make an MDX “similar” to an RX by adding aftermarket parts (HIDs, First aid kit etc.) and Genuine Acura accessories YES… but when you cost compare the price of the “discounted” RX330 and the MDX plus all the extras required (over $2000+ installation) to bring to comparable equipment… the MDX doesn’t provide the same value to the consumer that Lexus does right now.
But in a year when we are looking for Acura to take it to the next level with the redesign of the MDX and we all wait in anticipation I thought people might be interested in a direct comparison from somebody who’s actually owned both vehicles and not just looked at the brochure or taken a “test drive”. I’ve looked at the complete list of ’07 accessories (Thanks Tim!) and I see that Acura again is looking like it wants the owners to “build the RX from parts” rather than providing these items standard as a true luxury brand should… and yes that includes a “First Aid Kit”… just compare to BMW, Lexus, and Mercedes… Acura step it up and gives us the value back!
Yes I could have gotten the ’05 or even ’06 MDX but other than some refinements it would have been basically the “same car” I had been driving for that previous 4 years 10 months… I don’t change my cars like some out there as I pay cash and drive them for 4-5 years. My wife and I have had at least 1 Acura in the garage since 1989 so brand loyalty is not the issue. When I looked at sinking extra money into the MDX I felt it was for a lost cause as the MDX remaining value was pretty low. I didn’t want to roll it over into “the same car” and Lexus was willing to deal.
Another interesting note is that my auto insurance when I traded the ’01 MDX for the ’05 RX330 actually went DOWN by over 20% for a brand new vehicle (almost $400). I live in MA which has regulated/standardized insurance pricing so this troubled me. Nearest I can say is that the insurance industry must perceive the RX as lower risk, safer, and cheaper to repair than the MDX… Acura needs to step up on this too.
I guess to summarize is Acura needs to open its eyes and get back to its roots of providing good value to customers and stop trying to rest on its laurels.
The trade-off is vehicle size. You get more with an RX330 but you get a smaller vehicle. Lexus' equivalent size vehicle is much more expensive. Acura dealers now deal also - there are recent posts of buyers paying up to 2k below invoice for 2006's. |
|
|
| G. COLTON |
I looked at the RX330 before I bought the MDX. It is just too small!!
I also did not think that the value for the dollar paid was as good for the Lexus.
G |
|
|
| screbr |
quote:
Originally posted by 24Blacker11
I�m sorry you missed the point of the post so please let me clarify for you�
Yes the MDX is a great SUV and I loved owning mine� but there are many others out there and it is tough to learn much from reading the literature and doing a small test drive. I bought my MDX when the RX300 was the �big seller� because Acura presented a better value over the Lexus, BWM and most others at the time.
Can you make an MDX �similar� to an RX by adding aftermarket parts (HIDs, First aid kit etc.) and Genuine Acura accessories YES� but when you cost compare the price of the �discounted� RX330 and the MDX plus all the extras required (over $2000+ installation) to bring to comparable equipment� the MDX doesn�t provide the same value to the consumer that Lexus does right now.
I guess to summarize is Acura needs to open its eyes and get back to its roots of providing good value to customers and stop trying to rest on its laurels.
Thanks for your post - an interesting persective/comparison on the Lexus versus Acura.
I think you've understated the "size" and "performance" advantages of the MDX over the RX330. These aren't mere bullet-point options, but instead are the real differentiators. I think the RX330 is based off of the Highlander frame, which is clearly a smaller car than the MDX/Pilot. That was 90% of the sale for me.
Regarding the other options, some might prefer the fact that you can choose to add the features you've described, rather than having them assumed in the base price, and then hoping to deal the price down.
Several reports in this forum over the past few months have 2006 MDX's with Navi going for around $38, so it's still a better price.
Unlike most folks here (and you), I would consider myself a Toyota/Lexus enthiusiast, but I could not find the right combination of cost, size, and performance in their current line of SUV's. And I love the MDX thus far, and so maybe I'm becoming a convert... As I've stated in past threads, the X holds a pretty unique niche in the "just under 40K luxury SUV" market, where their size and value are unmatched. You have to pay 50-60K (or more) to get a simiilarly equiped SUV from another manufacturer.
I think (hope) the 2007 will close some of the gaps you've identified, and hopefully continue with strong styling and performance upgrades that make it a fun SUV to drive. |
|
|
| carguy1234 |
quote:
Originally posted by screbr
...Unlike most folks here (and you), I would consider myself a Toyota/Lexus enthusiast, but I could not find the right combination of cost, size, and performance in their current line of SUV's. ....
I'm exactly the same way - I would have rather bought a Toyota product but they didn't have anything that competed directly with the MDX when I bought it last year. Once the time comes again, I'll be looking hard at Toyota products again. I bet there are others in this same boat on here. |
|
|
| 24Blacker11 |
I didn't even touch on the other things like leather quality, fit and finish etc. which Lexus I feel uses much better quality materials.
I do believe that the RX was around LONG before the Highlander but its all loosely based on the Camry frame I believe...
Dimensionally the MDX and the RX are very close in size (with the exception of the width where MDX beats em all) I just can't evene myself figure what they did with all the space. I agree the RX feels ALOT smaller... but I usually am riding in the vehicle by myself and only have one 8 year old when there is a family trip, so size was not a big issue. |
|
|
| JL_SS |
quote:
Originally posted by 24Blacker11
I didn't even touch on the other things like leather quality, fit and finish etc. which Lexus I feel uses much better quality materials.
I do believe that the RX was around LONG before the Highlander but its all loosely based on the Camry frame I believe...
Dimensionally the MDX and the RX are very close in size (with the exception of the width where MDX beats em all) I just can't evene myself figure what they did with all the space. I agree the RX feels ALOT smaller... but I usually am riding in the vehicle by myself and only have one 8 year old when there is a family trip, so size was not a big issue.
So we've established two things: 1) Lexus can make a smaller, better appointed vehicle for around the same price as the MDX and 2) Acura can make a vehicle that is the size of the larger Lexus vehicles for substantially less by utilizing lesser quality interior materials. |
|
|
| flafrank66 |
What is the purpose of comparing a 2005 RX to a 2001 MDX? Your list of missing items on the MDX but included on the RX would be bewildering for anyone considering 2006 models.
The MDX also includes many advantages over the RX that you are not even considering. Including standard 4 wheel drive system and a more powerfull engine. I could go on but not sure what the purpose of your message is to begin with. |
|
|
| 24Blacker11 |
This used to be a board which appreciated shared opinions... glad to see all you posting are new MDX owners but I owned mine right from the start.
It would be safe to say that you all do not really know your facts. Look at the numbers. The MDX only exceeds the RX in length by 2.5" the biggest advantage the MDX has is width (about 5").
Alot of the other dimension the RX exceeds the MDX like front leg room, head room, wheel base... take a closer look.
And for the features of the 2006 vs. 2001 MDX there were not alot of features added that I had on the RX list. Sure they added a one touch moonroof and drivers window (RX has all windows not just drivers and at all doors). Rain sensing wipers YES... auto on NO. Headlights on the 2006 MDX are now auto on... wow! but no HIDs and also no built in washer.
I could go on but it's obvious this board does not appreciate the old timers who supported a community of shared information.
I don't regret buying the RX but I will be waiting for my '07 MDX and hope that Acura steps up its effort and makes the MDX a true luxury SUV and leaves the cheap end of the market for the RDX. |
|
|
| dj-mdx2 |
quote:
Originally posted by 24Blacker11
This used to be a board which appreciated shared opinions... glad to see all you posting are new MDX owners but I owned mine right from the start.
I could go on but it's obvious this board does not appreciate the old timers who supported a community of shared information.
Touchy, touchy :D I don't know about you but to me so far the exchanges have been pretty benign. When you post on a public forum, especially comparing different vehicles form different years, you will of necessity invite passionate responses. And that's what you got.:confused: |
|
|
| JeffK |
Dear 24Blacker11
Here is your list of "must have items" items and my comments:
Wood Steering Wheel - I prefer leather to wood
• Wood Shift Knob - I prefer leather to wood
• HID headlights with washers - I agree
• Steerable Headlight beams - Not sure how much this actually helps
• Dual Climate Controls (Driver/Pass) - Good feature
• Dual Multi-temp Heated seats (Driver/Pass) - standard on MDX
• Auto-on/Rain Sensing Wipers (Auto Speed Control) - Do not want
• Auto-on Headlights - standard on MDX
• Power Lift Gate (remote & driver switch) - do not need
• Rear Cargo Cover - do not use or want
• First Aid Kit - $9.95 at Drug store
• Lighted Steering wheel Controls - what purpose is this?
• Lighted door handles and center console - are you saying you cannot find the door handles at night???
• Telescoping Steering wheel - good feature
• 18” Wheels - no advantage here - just more expensive to replace
• Body Side Molding - no value
• Cargo Mat - $100 from Tim
• Rear Spoiler/Wind Deflector - no need
• Second Row Seating Slide and Recline - no need as MDX has more leg room
• Second Row Center Storage Compartment - MDX has more storage to begin with, not necessary
• Second Row Center Pass-thru - good feature
• One Touch Up/Down Power Windows - available on drivers side
• One Touch Open/Close Power Moon Roof - so hold the button for 5 seconds!!!
• Driver Leg (under dash) airbag - good feature
What I really do not understand, is that even with your $6,000 discount, the RX 330 is still many, many thousands of dollars more than MDX.
The RX 330 is a very well constructed vehicle - all Lexus/Toyota's are. I submit that the build difference between Lexus/Toyotas and Acura/Honda is marginal. However, the dealership service at Lexus is second to none.
But what you give up is the cargo capacity of MDX. For example, if you take the cargo mat from your RX and go to a Subaru dealer and place it in the back of an Outback it will not fit! I repeat it will not fit!. Space behind the seats of the RX is less than in a Subaru Outback!.
I know this for a fact as I owned a Subaru and before I got my MDX I measured the space in the Outback, MDX and RX 330.
So you paid many thousands more, picked up a few "goodies", gave up a whole lotta space and will have a more upscale service experience.
I for one think it is a terrible trade off - that is why I have an MDX!
JeffK |
|
|
| JeffK |
Point of Clarification:
Lexus/Toyota policy is to use a basic platform for many models.
This is called Badge engineering and is now common to all manufacturers.
Where Lexus/Toyota is different is that they usually start with the upscale model first (Lexus) and then migrate to Toyota.
The Badge engineering on the RX 330 is as follows:
Toyota Camry is the platform for the Lexus RX 300. The RX 300 morphed into the RX 330. After the RX 330 hit the market, Toyota introduced the Highlander with the smaller engine.
Both the Highlander and RX are based on the Camry running gear and platform.
Another case of Badge engineering is the Lexus ES 330 which is also based on the Camry.
There is nothing wrong with this, as to produce a new platform costs billions of dollars. This is a way for a manufacturer to recoup development costs.
Another prime example of Badge Engineering are the GM Chevy Trailblazers, GMC Envoy and the new Saab. Three different price points, but basically the same vehicle.
Same is true for Ford Explorer and Lincoln Navigator.
The list goes on and on.
JeffK |
|
|
| Prospective Buy |
| Your comparison is rather one sided. Compare a TOPL 2005 MDX to a TOPL 2005 RX330...and be shue to note any price difference. |
|
|
| Dog |
quote:
Originally posted by 24Blacker11
I’m sorry you missed the point of the post so please let me clarify for you…
Based on the responses above, it looks like everyone is missing your point.:hmmm: |
|
|
| DaleB |
Being badge engineered (Odyssey to MDX) is an advantage in terms of space for the MDX.
As far as the other features the Lexus has vs. the MDX does not have, are simply personal choice.
If MDX offered them, we don't know if many buyers would not opt for them, driving the cost closer to the Lexus.
But many of the features listed have been discussed as desirable features on this forum over the years.
I think it's a bit disingenuous to say because the MDX does not have them it's better, we don't need them, and rather pay less money. You can't really assume that for everyone.
:)
Of course, being more affordable is also a nice feature. But compromise creeps into everything. |
|
|
| 24Blacker11 |
Just let it be known here that don't be surprised when the '07 MDX hits the market that the price will be elevated into the RX range... and as I've stated the MDX will fall short on several areas of equipment which are standard on the RX... It won't change my decision unless the price is crazy high. I will be buying my '07 MDX when it is released.
You all need to relax and just take this for what it is... In the year we all are waiting for the new MDX to be released it pays to know the competition. Many of you have only been looking at the RX's on the street or even taken a "test drive" which may not give you a very fair comparison. I offer some thoughts having been and MDX loyal owner for nearly 5 years and now an RX owner who has seen what the competition is first hand.
I hope the MDX price doesn't increase too much... it surely will have to because the lower price point will be crowded with the RDX taking the low to mid 30's range.
The added features already being observed from first discussions with Acura and also the accessory list from Tim indicates the price will have to increase if not on the bottom end surely on the top end.
We'll all have to wait and see who's right... but in September or October when we're all waiting for the '07 deliveries I won't say I told ya so :D ! |
|
|
| JL_SS |
quote:
Originally posted by 24Blacker11
Just let it be known here that don't be surprised when the '07 MDX hits the market that the price will be elevated into the RX range... and as I've stated the MDX will fall short on several areas of equipment which are standard on the RX... It won't change my decision unless the price is crazy high. I will be buying my '07 MDX when it is released.
You all need to relax and just take this for what it is... In the year we all are waiting for the new MDX to be released it pays to know the competition. Many of you have only been looking at the RX's on the street or even taken a "test drive" which may not give you a very fair comparison. I offer some thoughts having been and MDX loyal owner for nearly 5 years and now an RX owner who has seen what the competition is first hand.
I hope the MDX price doesn't increase too much... it surely will have to because the lower price point will be crowded with the RDX taking the low to mid 30's range.
The added features already being observed from first discussions with Acura and also the accessory list from Tim indicates the price will have to increase if not on the bottom end surely on the top end.
We'll all have to wait and see who's right... but in September or October when we're all waiting for the '07 deliveries I won't say I told ya so :D !
Price will probably increase, but unless you really need a vehicle in Sept/Oct I would not buy the MDX until at least Jan unless you are happy paying MSRP. If the SUV market stays depressed because of gas prices and Acura doesn't limit MDX production, then given the recent Honda/Acura model release pattern, you should be able to get the new MDX close to at invoice early in 2007. |
|
|
| DaleB |
quote:
Originally posted by 24Blacker11
We'll all have to wait and see who's right... but in September or October when we're all waiting for the '07 deliveries I won't say I told ya so :D !
None of us will really know anything at this point with regards to future models, MDX or RX330. There is something out there for everyone's taste.
Who's right or wrong is more about who has a better crystal ball, and does it really matter? I think not in the big scheme of things. |
|
|
| carguy1234 |
I'm just back from the Auto Show, and got a chance to compare these two pretty much side by side, inside and out (2006 versions).
My recollection was right from a year ago - the RX is so much smaller in terms of interior room that I don't even consider these two competitors.
I do think the RX is a step up in overall quality of materials compared to the MDX, but the MDX has so much more interior room that the RX is not something to consider unless you don't have a family or don't ever need anything more than a small amount of carge space.
I thought the Paul McCartney RX was pretty cool though! And Lexus and Toyota definitely had the majority of the people checking out their models. Honda was busy too. Acura was very quiet in comparison. |
|
|
| KES |
It is too bad Honda can not bring the 07 to market sooner than October. Honda has announced a production slowdown on the two facilities that make the MDX, Pilot, Odyssey and Ridgeline to cope with high inventories. The article is not specific to which vehicle's production is going to be reduced but did include the following...
From Autoweek - As of Jan. 1, American Honda had a 54-day supply of the MDX and a 53-day supply of the Ridgeline. Those levels are down from 82 days for the MDX and 72 days for the Ridgeline on Dec. 1.
It would be great if the 07 MDX could be accelerated by a few months. Also, the 07 RX350 is basically the same as the 06 but Lexus has increased the engine size and horsepower to 270. We will have to wait and see the response from Honda |
|
|
| colemanpc |
Interesting comparison and I'm only chiming in because we had an RX330, then moved into an MDX.
The RX330 is an extremely luxurious vehicle. Unfortunately, if you have a couple of kids (as I do) the interior is as delicate as it is luxurious. The MDX, alternatively, is much more practical, and durable - things you look for when your kids are kicking the back of your seat the entire trip.
Another big issue I had between the two models is the navigation system. Acura lets the owners decide if it's safe to use while traveling. Lexus disables virtually all functionality once you start moving. This makes no sense - as your passenger may want to program in an address, or look for a waypoint on your way. Essentially you pay $2K for a system that only works in your driveway.
Ditto for the majority of functions on the bluetooth phone; you can't use the RX330 address book once in motion.
And the voice command system in the RX is a big waste of money/time; it's so slow that it's just faster to push a button. The MDX system is infinitely faster, and does far more than the RX; controls climate, bluetooth, etc - where the RX can only control "some" radio and navigation functions.
Again, if you're paying for the navi and bluetooth, you should be able to use it the 98% of the time you use the car: when you're driving.
Then comes size. Sorry, we tried, we really did, but a smaller vehicle like the RX just doesn't cut it. Try putting someone between two car seats in the back seat and you'll understand right away.
Don't get me wrong, the RX is a beautiful car inside and out. It's well made and there are things I miss - the two biggest are the HID lights (so bright, so safe at night) and just looking at the interior as I drove it (man was it nice/eye candy).
However, after we tried the Lexus route, I realize that brand is something that'd only be usable if I put a car above the family - or when the kids head off to college.
Between now and then the MDX is the only vehicle that has the reliability, technology, space, and practicality combination I need/want. |
|
|
| aallarde |
your comparison is pathetic...
Reading is the key to knowledge.
Stick to the RX, RX was design as a girlie man vehicle... |
|
|
| colemanpc |
quote:
Originally posted by aallarde
your comparison is pathetic...
Reading is the key to knowledge.
Stick to the RX, RX was design as a girlie man vehicle...
You say "reading is the key to knowledge" yet you missed that I'm driving an MDX.
And girlie man vehicle? Is that supposed to have hit my ego? This coming from a "man" who wants to watch DVDs while in park?
Well, you got me there, Mr. Beats-his-chest, shortly after I bought my wife an RX I was in for the castration. Now, being a eunuch (you're going to have to look that up, aren't you?), I just don't know how to compare cars; had I kept my little buddies I might have known the RX is for girls - end of debate. |
|
|
| aallarde |
| My post was not meant for you... How pathetic you are must be.. even selecting your 06 MDX color, looks like the stool on my rear end... |
|
|
| colemanpc |
quote:
Originally posted by aallarde
My post was not meant for you... How pathetic you are must be.. even selecting your 06 MDX color, looks like the stool on my rear end...
Sweet! Unable to make a sentence. Lack of eloquence and etiquette.
I love retardation.
By the way, I did stuff my balls between my legs when I drove the RX. Maybe your girlie analysis is far more insightful than I initially gave you credit for there, Corky.
God help you if you're crapping Amazon green.
And if you want to attempt to insult me further, I'd urge you to do it via PM; it's a waste of everyone's time and your insight here - and in the MDX vs. FX vs. RX - is worthless. |
|
|
| aallarde |
Great, back in school I guess. I must be answering to a professor with high class. That's wonderful.
Great for you joy riding an RX, girlie man. You must have XX type.
By the way, what's a PM? I just registered today to this forum. All I got from you is private messages attributing on your charisma. All I did is just responded to your judgement towards me. The only way for me to do that is "post reply", that's all I know. Sorry.
From what I can tell your creating hallucination for those forum readers. Bad characteristic. For someone who has been in this forum for quite sometime really enjoys sticking there eggs over somebody's else sentenece.
Have you stick your hotdog to the RX muffler so far, Corky? The fumes must be frying your brain. |
|
|
| dj-mdx2 |
quote:
Originally posted by aallarde
Great, back in school I guess. I must be answering to a professor with high class. That's wonderful.
Great for you joy riding an RX, girlie man. You must have XX type.
By the way, what's a PM? I just registered today to this forum. All I got from you is private messages attributing on your charisma. All I did is just responded to your judgement towards me. The only way for me to do that is "post reply", that's all I know. Sorry.
From what I can tell your creating hallucination for those forum readers. Bad characteristic. For someone who has been in this forum for quite sometime really enjoys sticking there eggs over somebody's else sentenece.
Have you stick your hotdog to the RX muffler so far, Corky? The fumes must be frying your brain.
:11: :11: :9: :ghetto: :shutup: |
|
|
| colemanpc |
quote:
Originally posted by aallarde
Great, back in school I guess. I must be answering to a professor with high class. That's wonderful.
Great for you joy riding an RX, girlie man. You must have XX type.
By the way, what's a PM? I just registered today to this forum. All I got from you is private messages attributing on your charisma. All I did is just responded to your judgement towards me. The only way for me to do that is "post reply", that's all I know. Sorry.
From what I can tell your creating hallucination for those forum readers. Bad characteristic. For someone who has been in this forum for quite sometime really enjoys sticking there eggs over somebody's else sentenece.
Have you stick your hotdog to the RX muffler so far, Corky? The fumes must be frying your brain.
PM is private messaging - of which you've sent me two already; one to say "FU"; and the other to say your rear-end is the same color as my car (please do wipe better).
Now, if you have anything further to say, please do PM me. It's senseless anyone else would have to suffer through another one of your responses.
Enough of the douche-baggery! |
|
|
| dj-mdx2 |
quote:
Originally posted by aallarde
Great, back in school I guess. I must be answering to a professor with high class. That's wonderful.
Great for you joy riding an RX, girlie man. You must have XX type.
By the way, what's a PM? I just registered today to this forum. All I got from you is private messages attributing on your charisma. All I did is just responded to your judgement towards me. The only way for me to do that is "post reply", that's all I know. Sorry.
From what I can tell your creating hallucination for those forum readers. Bad characteristic. For someone who has been in this forum for quite sometime really enjoys sticking there eggs over somebody's else sentenece.
Have you stick your hotdog to the RX muffler so far, Corky? The fumes must be frying your brain.
I received your belligerent PMs and will not stoop to your level. You do have the distinction of being the first on my ignore list. |
|
|
|
