| dj-mdx2 |
| Great video. I found it curious that on the last few screens, the bang for buck was 3 out of 5 stars, the lowest rating compared to performance, handling and interior. Acura usually has the best bang for the buck compared to the other marques mentioned. |
|
|
| gmc74 |
quote:
Originally posted by dj-mdx2
Great video. I found it curious that on the last few screens, the bang for buck was 3 out of 5 stars, the lowest rating compared to performance, handling and interior. Acura usually has the best bang for the buck compared to the other marques mentioned.
I tend to agree, how can the bang for the buck be so low when compared to cars that are much more expensive, and about the same if not worse, performance wise... odd |
|
|
| burnside |
quote:
Originally posted by dj-mdx2
Great video. I found it curious that on the last few screens, the bang for buck was 3 out of 5 stars, the lowest rating compared to performance, handling and interior. Acura usually has the best bang for the buck compared to the other marques mentioned.
I didn't understand that either. I wonder what a Cayenne or X5 would get for best bang for the buck. |
|
|
| dj-mdx2 |
quote:
Originally posted by burnside
I didn't understand that either. I wonder what a Cayenne or X5 would get for best bang for the buck.
Probably a negative star, or black hole, if there were such a rating system. :2: |
|
|
|
